The “Absentee’s Property Laws” and You
Most people who claim to know things about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have never heard of these laws, and why would they? Many “scholars” simply ignore the foundation of Israel as a nation and simply begin to talk about the anti-semitic nature of Arab culture and how Islam is unable to accept the freedoms of the West. The Absentee’s Property Laws are something that rival the Jim Crow Laws that used to be in place in the United States. I would argue even worse.
‘Absentees’ property’ laws were several laws which were first introduced as emergency ordinances issued by the Jewish leadership but which after the war were incorporated into the laws of Israel. These laws were passed in an effort to gain as much land from the indigenous people as possible while circumventing International Law. Here are the Absentee’s Property Laws as they passed and enforced :
So lets break this down piece by piece. The first section defines “absentee” as anyone who lived in British Mandate Palestine and held citizenship to any of the following countries :Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, SaudiArabia, Trans-Jordan, Iraq or the Yemen. It also extended this terminology to anyone who was in one of these countries or in any part of Palestine outside the area of Israel, or was a Palestinian citizen and left his ordinary place of residence in Palestine during, before or after Israel’s war of independence. Notice how this law did not apply to Immigrants or land owners residing in non-Arab countries. So if a British citizen had owned land in Palestine, he would not be subject to this law. People who lived in Palestine were, and we can assume a vast majority of them were of Arab ethnicity and from any number of different religions (at least 5 large ones). (Click Here for Story about land given back to British Owner)
The definition of “absentee” in the law was framed in such a way as to ensure that it applied to every Palestinian or resident in Palestine who had left his usual place of residence in Palestine for any place inside or outside the country after the adoption of the partition of Palestine resolution by the UN.
So these people had left their homes for numerous reasons during this time period. The reason cited most often by survivors of the time was for safety. There was, of course, a war going on in the immediate area and like all peace loving civilians, they fled to safer regions to protect their lives and the lives of their children. Can anyone blame them after hearing about the massacres at Deir Yassin, Al-Tantura, and the Lod/Ramla killings?
These people had their homes and land taken from them and put into the custody of the The Minister of Finance who can appoint inspectors to designate whether a house has an absent owner. Once declared absent every right an absentee had in any property shall pass automatically to the Custodian at the time of the vesting of the property; and the status of the Custodian shall be the same as was that of the owner of the property. Meaning that if you were Arab and not home (because a war perhaps) you no longer had any rights to your property. Furthermore:
The fact that the identity of an absentee is unknown shall not prevent his property from being absentees’ property, vested property, held property or released property.
This part was created to ensure that no knowledge or documentation would be necessary when confiscating the land.
Now we can move onto those Palestinians who chose not to leave their homes.
Where vested property of the category of immovable property is occupied by a person who, in the opinion of the Custodian, has no right to occupy it, the Custodian may confirm such fact by a certificate under his hand describing the property. The certificate shall have the effect of a judgment in favour of the Custodian for the expulsion of the occupier of the vested property.
So, even if you chose to stay in your home and tend to your land the Israeli government could arbitrarily expel you from your home and claim it under these laws. Sub-Section A under this heading also states that any homes deemed to be immovable and built without the authorization of the Minister of Finance should be demolished (no matter if the home was built before the foundation of Israel).
Section 35 of the law states that any Israeli citizen who fails to report land that is not currently occupied by its owner is subject to two years imprisonment and a fine of 500 pounds (remember this is 1947-1951).
As a result, two million dunams were confiscated and given to the custodian, who later transferred the land to the development authority. This law created the novel citizenship category of “present absentees” (nifkadim nohahim), that is, Israeli Arabs who enjoyed all civil rights-including the right to vote in the Knesset elections-except one: the right to use and dispose of their property”. About 30,000-35,000 Palestinians became “present absentees” - persons present at the time but considered absent.
How much of Israel’s territory consists of land confiscated with the Absentee Property Law is uncertain and much disputed. Robert Fisk interviewed the Israeli Custodian of Absentee Property, who estimates this could amount to up to 70% of the territory of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
The absentee property played an enormous role in making Israel a viable state. In 1954, more than one third of Israel’s Jewish population lived on absentee property and nearly a third of the new immigrants (250,000 people) settled in urban areas abandoned by Arabs. Of 370 new Jewish settlements established between 1948 and 1953, 350 were on absentee property (Peretz, Israel and the Palestinian Arabs, 1958).
The Land Acquisition (Validation of Acts and Compensation) Law, 5713-1953 legalised expropriations (retroactively in many cases) for military purposes or for the establishment of (Jewish) settlements.
The law allows the Government to claim the property of lands which are not in the possession of its owner as of 1 April 1952. Article 2 (a) states:
Property in respect of which the Minister certifies by certificate under his hand–
- (1) that on the 6th Nisan, 5712 (1st April, 1952) it was not in the possession of its owners; and
- (2) that within the period between the 5th Iyar, 5708 (14th May, 1948) and the 6th Nisan, 5712 (Ist April 1952) it was used or assigned for purposes of essential development, settlement or security; and
- (3) that it is still required for any of these purposes
The Prescription Law was first enacted in 1958 and amended in 1965. It repeals critical provisions of, and reverses British practices in relation to, the Ottoman Land Code (1858).
According to COHRE and BADIL (p. 44), the Prescription Law is one of the most critical to understanding the legal underpinnings of Israel’s acquisition of Palestinian lands. Although not readily apparent in the language of the law, the purpose behind this legislation was to enable Israel to claim as ‘State lands’ areas where Palestinians still predominated and where they could still assert their own claims on the land (for example, in the north of the country). The authors claim that this law, in conjunction with the Land (Settlement of Title) Ordinance (Amendment) Law, 5720-1960, the Land (Settlement of Title) Ordinance (New Version), 5729-1969 and the Land Law, 5729-1969, was designed to revise criteria related to the use and registration of Miri lands – one of the most prevalent types in Palestine – and to facilitate Israel’s acquisition of such land.
Under this law, farmers are required to submit documentation proving uninterrupted cultivation of designated plots of land
over a 15-year period (the ‘prescription’ period). Article 5 states:
The period within which a claim in respect of which an action has not been brought shall be prescribed (such period being hereinafter referred to as “the period of prescription”) shall be
- (1) in the case of a claim not relating to land - seven years;
- (2) in the case of a claim relating to land - fifteen years or, if the land has been registered in the land register after settlement of title in accordance with the Land (Settlement of Title) Ordinance(1), twenty-five years.
The law adds the proviso that lands purchased after 1 March 1943 would be subject to a 20-year verification period. The law also specifies a five-year hiatus between 1958 and 1963 that would not be counted toward this ‘prescription’ period. According to COHRE and BADIL, by 1963, much of the lands in question had still not been surveyed. Therefore, calculations of the requisite 20-year verification period were in effect halted, and the State was in a position to press its own claims to these lands. The authors consider that the Prescription Law had even more complex ramifications. For example, Israel decided that British aerial photographs of 1945 would be used to verify cultivation. Arab farmers who had not yet begun tilling their lands at the time the photographs were taken found they were by definition unable to meet the requisite 15-year ‘prescription’ period. Also, as Israel did not accept other evidence of cultivation, such as tax records, many Palestinians fell victim to a ‘Catch-22’: in the process of trying to establish their legal ownership they (retroactively) lost their lands.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_and_Property_laws_in_Israel#The_.27Absentees_Property_Law.27
Here is a somewhat complete list of the villages taken over and demolished during the enforcement of these laws (ie: The past 60 years)


Stumble It!


